A mass notification system (MNS) is designed to clearly communicate with people during a catastrophic disaster or threat, steering them away from danger and toward safety. There are two MNS classifications: wide-area, providing real-time information to outdoor areas, and in-building, providing information and instruction to people inside a building by way of intelligible voice communications and often, visible signals, text, and graphics. This article will focus on a specific aspect of the in-building MNS, the voice communications of an emergency communication system (ECS) that provides fire alarm, public address, fire fighter, area of refuge, and elevator communications during an emergency. The National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) provides code requirements for a MNS and ECS used for these purposes, as well as weather emergencies, terrorist events, biological, chemical, and nuclear emergencies, and other threats. The NFPA code referred to in this article is the NFPA 72® National Fire Alarm Code® 2010 and 2013 editions.

The NFPA added two new terms related to building communications to its National Fire Alarm Code® revision in 2010: acoustically distinguishable space (ADS) and speech intelligibility. An ADS is a space that is acoustically different from adjacent spaces and therefore requires a different approach to the design of the adjacent spaces: translated into code-speak, this space is “an emergency communications system notification zone, or subdivision thereof, that might be an enclosed or otherwise physically defined space, or that might be distinguished from other spaces because of different acoustical, environmental, or use characteristics, such as reverberation time and ambient sound pressure level.” An example of an ADS could be a multi-story atrium adjacent to low-ceiling concourses. Speech intelligibility, as the name implies, is a measure of the actual understandability of speech when all factors (acoustics of the space, background noise levels, and sound system design) are considered. These terms have greatly changed the design of communication systems for buildings.

Prior to the National Fire Alarm Code® 2010 and 2013 edition changes, fire protection engineers were required to design systems to be audible, which meant announcements were louder than the ambient noise in the space by 15 dBA (the logarithmic scale used to measure levels of sound). This design approach applied to all types of acoustic spaces and did not address the complexities of room acoustics, ambient noise control, and transducer (loudspeaker) selection, often resulting in audible announcements that were not intelligible.

Millions of people visit large, complex buildings such as transportation hubs, healthcare facilities, convention centers, and casinos every year. Emergency communications in these facilities must be clear to prevent panic, injury, and loss of life, particularly because the visitors to these types of buildings generally are not familiar with the facility and have difficulty finding a safe exit path without explicit instruction. To illustrate this point, let’s consider what people might experience in an airport.

Travelers at an international airport arrive at an expansive four- or five-story open space in the main terminal that houses ticketing; security, international arrivals, baggage claim, and concourse areas with restaurants and retail shops may be in separate areas with lower ceilings and completely different architectural finishes. Each of these airport areas is an ADS, perhaps zoned into smaller ADSs depending on the architecture. The reverberation time and background noise level (ambient sound pressure level) are factors that must be considered by acousticians and designers during the design of the ECS in order to provide the specified level of intelligibility, a threshold determined by the Speech Transmission Index (STI) set forth by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).

As an example, a traveler may arrive to acoustic bedlam in the main terminal due to the non-absorptive finishes throughout the terminal. The finishes cause a buildup of reverberant sound, making it almost impossible to understand a talker only a few feet away from a listener. The paging system is operational, but only adds to the background noise. The traveler cannot understand the announcements due to the high reverberation time and the poor location of loudspeakers. The high noise levels and inability to understand courtesy and information announcements only add to the travelers’ anxiety. If a catastrophic event occurs, the traveler will not be able to understand the announcements.

Contrast that to a similar main terminal that is just as active but with generous absorptive finishes that provide a relaxing atmosphere, allowing the traveler to easily orient to his surroundings. The paging system has been designed to provide courtesy and information announcements clearly and at a conversational level. Emergency announcements are clear and concise, providing straightforward direction and guidance to the travelers.

The changes in the NFPA-72® National Fire Alarm Code® 2010 and 2013 editions finally bring intelligibility to the forefront in the design of emergency communication systems. Designers and engineers working with the building owner and architect can optimize the acoustics and systems in each acoustically distinguishable space to provide clear, intelligible communications, often without increasing the cost of the systems significantly. The end result is a facility with intelligible communication systems that may reduce panic, injury, and loss of life during a crisis.

About the author

Closs_Ric_VRichard Closs, CTS-D, is the director of the systems group at Acentech, a multi-disciplinary acoustics, audiovisual systems design, and vibration consulting firm. For more information, please visit www.acentech.com.

New construction and renovation projects in populated areas create noise and vibration for both neighbors and occupants, with sensitivities ranging from inconsequential to critical. Construction work near existing facilities has the potential to adversely affect sensitive equipment and activities, including microscopes, MRIs, and mice, as well as data centers and performance spaces. With proper understanding, consideration, and communication, the project manager can ensure a smooth vibration monitoring process and minimize obstacles to cost and scheduling.

General contractors often employ vibration monitors around the construction site to protect neighboring buildings from vibration-related damage. For sensitive equipment, however, the vibration levels of concern can be more than 100 times lower than those associated with even minor cosmetic building damage. In such cases, more sophisticated monitoring systems are needed to measure and assess the potential adverse effects of construction-related vibration.

Vibration sensitive equipment, such as electron microscopes and MRIs for example, typically have very detailed vibration criteria, which are often frequency dependent (the allowable level varies depending on the frequency of the vibration). And until recently, electron microscopes and MRIs were typically located on grade-supported slabs, often in a hospital’s basement. This type of equipment is now being used on higher floors where it is closer to patients. Above-grade building floors are more flexible and are more prone to vibrations, which may interfere with the equipment’s efficient operation. Sophisticated systems are needed to evaluate the vibrations at multiple frequencies at the same time.

With an Internet connection, these sophisticated monitoring systems can be placed in the field to monitor the vibration remotely in near real time and to send alarm messages by text or email when the criterion limits are exceeded, allowing the contractor to adjust means and methods to reduce the offending vibration. During times when the vibrations are within safe limits, the monitoring systems can provide peace of mind to researchers and staff in the facility.

At New England Baptist Hospital, vibration measurements were carried out in sensitive areas of the hospital before and during a series of representative construction activities. The measured vibrations were compared to criteria for MRIs, CT scanners, and operating rooms, in order to evaluate the potential impacts. The tests and data were used to educate the hospital staff and to devise strategies that permitted the hospital to continue carrying out its work during construction without continuous monitoring. At Boston Medical Center, real-time vibration monitoring of the vibrations in the sensitive areas was used during construction, with automatic alarms sent to project and hospital personnel if any pre-set vibration limits were exceeded. This allowed the hospital and construction personnel to anticipate complaints from staff and to mitigate the construction activity, if necessary.

Remote monitoring – where measurement systems are installed in critical areas and their data are observed at other convenient locations – has been found to be especially useful not only for coping with construction, but also for evaluating the suitability of sites being considered for sensitive activities. As an example of the latter, remote monitoring is being used at the University of Connecticut Health Center to determine whether a selected location on a higher floor is suitable for relocation of its Center for Advanced Reproductive Services. In cases such as the ones illustrated here, remote monitoring can be a cost-efficient tool in view of its capability to provide data and alarms in real-time and thus to protect hospital environments and other buildings from undue vibrations – all without the need to have specialists on site for extended periods.

About the author


Marc Newmark is a senior consultant in noise and vibration at Acentech, a multi-disciplinary acoustics, audiovisual systems design, and vibration consulting firm with offices in Cambridge, Mass., Trevose, Penn., and Los Angeles, Calif. For more information, please visit www.acentech.com.

Should your staff be working from home? Research says…

September 28, 2015

There are two sides to every story.  Depending on the person you ask, or the industry you ask the question in, the concept of working from home will either be loved or hated.  Research conducted at Stanford back in 2014 has some concrete evidence that proponents of working from your home office, couch or kitchen […]

Read the full article →

Infusing Creative Design into the Open Office Concept

September 23, 2015

There is no denying that the open office concept has worked its way into many corporations and workplaces.  IFMA Boston has covered this workspace trend here on this blog, and has seen the trend in action at various programs over the past couple of years.  We’ve learned that while many love the collaborative nature of […]

Read the full article →

Fox RPM Corp. Acquired by BRG

September 14, 2015

Fox and BRG Clients Will Now Benefit from an Enhanced North American Footprint, International Delivery Capability, Expanded Service Offerings and Industry Leading IWMS Technology Solutions. BRG, an international Workplace Management Solutions firm, today announced their acquisition of Fox RPM Corp., a leading provider of Project Management and Relocation Management services throughout the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic […]

Read the full article →

How are Millennials influencing the demand for real estate?

July 29, 2015

For many, the construction and development of a host of new mixed-use and high-rise residential properties across Boston is proof of the greatly-hyped desire for neighborhoods with a “live-work-play” attitude.  New studies show that the demand for close-knit urban living is rooted in the changing demographics of the 21st century workforce, which is now largely dominated by […]

Read the full article →

Can a work space help companies attract top talent?

July 21, 2015

The new TripAdvisor headquarters (right nearby in Needham, MA) is a hot topic at water coolers around Greater Boston this week.  The Boston Globe’s “Beta Boston” section recently showed off the impressive workplace for all to see.  While not every company is looking to house up to 1,500 employees, the story has everyone talking about ways to […]

Read the full article →

Vote for the 2015 People’s Choice Award

April 27, 2015

The nominations are in and it’s time for you to vote for your People’s Choice!  Review all of the nominations here and then place your vote.  Voting ends at noon on Friday, May 1st!  Then don’t miss this year’s Awards of Excellence on Wednesday, May 20th at 6:00 PM to take place at the Institute […]

Read the full article →

Could Don Draper work in an open office environment?

April 7, 2015

That intriguing question is answered in a recent Inc.com article by author Niki Hall, and will undoubtedly be an interesting one to any of our fellow IFMA Members who are also fans of the AMC TV show Mad Men.  Though the links between Facility Management and 1960’s Madison Avenue advertising may seem tenuous at first, […]

Read the full article →

Awards of Excellence Online System is Up

March 24, 2015

The new online system for the Awards of Excellence is now open and accepting registrations at http://awards.ifmaboston.org/nominations.  There you can register yourself as a nominator and then select the Award type you would like to do for your first nomination.  As with any online system, save often.  You can save and work on your nomination […]

Read the full article →